casinos not in gamstop

 

 

 

It seems that the latest dispute between the New Jersey casinos and the Gamblers Paradise Inc. over a law passed in Gamonton, N.J. allows gamblers to "self-exclude" themselves from gambling at the Casinos in Gamstop, N.J. on their wedding day or any other day. If you are reading this then you have probably already been hearing about this latest development in New Jersey gambling law. I'm going to try and explain some of the ramifications of this for both the casinos and the operators of the various casinos in Gamonton, N.J. Most of this information comes straight from the NAR National Association of Realtors official Internet website where you can check out all of the latest news, commentaries, and articles about housing, real estate, education, immigration, and a lot more.

 

So what does this mean for the New Jersey casinos and the people who work there? The law in question says that any casino that allows its customers to "self-exclude" themselves on wedding days is breaking the law and should be fined, or even shut down permanently. The reasoning behind this is that the casinos are essentially offering money to their customers in the form of slot winnings and the lady aida casino wants to ensure that they get paid. Obviously, the New Jersey State Gaming Commission would love to see this all go away so they've been sending out cease and desist orders to the casinos. As of this writing, seven casinos remain open.

 

This all comes down to the question of whether or not casinos not in Gamestation, N.J. can continue to operate while being able to offer their guests free slots. At first, I thought this was just another ploy by the New Jersey State Gaming Commission to keep gambling sites from having to compete with legitimate gambling sites. However, none of that appeared to be the case. Apparently, the lady aida casino is appealing the court's decision to the lower courts so as to avoid paying taxes on income that they gained from playing slot games in other states. In short, she can take her slot games anywhere she likes.

 

Now, the question becomes, will the New Jersey Gaming Commission stand by their decision or try to have the minimum deposit requirements changed to something that is more reasonable? Obviously, they won't have much of a casinos not in gamstop, since any casinos not in Gamestation, NJ are required by law to provide a "live dealer" at all times. On top of that, the minimum deposit requirement changes from state to state. In some instances, it may be as low as a dollar or two. Since the minimum deposits are mandated by the state, it stands to reason that they won't have very much choice.

 

It is my contention that online casinos should not be regulated by the New Jersey State Gaming Commission at all, because the Commission has no power to change gaming laws. Live dealers at all times mean that there is a live person monitoring the action, and the only way that the gaming law can be changed is by a voter initiative, which is highly unlikely in New Jersey, where the governorship is a Democratic stronghold. Secondly, minimum deposits should only apply to licensed casinos - which are governed by different rules than online casinos. And thirdly, the New Jersey State Gaming Commission has no business regulating private companies for the simple fact that they operate in the state, which is an "atomized state" in that no two municipalities are the same, and private entities cannot move into a neighboring municipality without getting the consent of that municipality.

 

The best solution is for the New Jersey Gaming Commission to completely abolish the commission it currently exists and set up a non Gaming Authority for Gaming in New Jersey. Let the people decide if they want to continue to allow non casinos in the state of New Jersey, or if they want to regulate them instead. At the very least, we should put an end to the ridiculous and unfair gaming laws that they have placed on the gaming landscape today.